Taylor Swift Wins the Presidential Debate (But Other Stuff Happened, Too)
Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images
Kamala Harris prepped for Tuesday’s first presidential debate with Donald Trump by participating in mock debates, practicing with a Trump stand-in and using a lit stage to mimic the actual setting. Once the real 90-minute debate began, Harris largely stuck to her game plan: deliver her talking points, draw a contrast with Trump, and let Trump go off. When it was all over, as the last of so-called swing voters were telling their cable-news focus groups how they thought Harris won but they’re still undecided and probably leaning toward Trump, Taylor Swift upstaged it all.
In an Instagram post, Swift wrote that she was voting for Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz “because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them. I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos.”
“I’ve done my research, and I’ve made my choice. Your research is all yours to do, and the choice is yours to make,” she added, encouraging people to register to vote, and vote early. She signed her name, and below that “Childless Cat Lady,” a jab at Trump’s running mate, JD Vance.
It may end up being the most important takeaway from the debate in a presidential election that is essentially tied and going to be decided by a few thousand voters in a few states who have extremely chaotic opinions about politics over this past decade. With those margins, the star of the Super Bowl might have a tiny little edge over a primetime news special on ABC news, two months out from election day.
So we could probably wrap it up there, and just wait to see how this all plays out on November 5th. But this is America, damnit, and we are nothing if not a country that must go through the familiar motions of analyzing this debate as if it matters and pretend nothing at all is broken in our democracy.
This was the first meeting between Trump and Harris, and it was framed as an essential moment for Harris to reintroduce herself to America and draw a contrast with Trump for voters who say they are not familiar with her. She largely did that, mostly by allowing Trump to be Trump. In a lot of ways, the debate really seemed like two separate realities: Harris semi-answered the ABC moderators’ questions, but focused on hitting her key talking points, especially on big issues like abortion and Trump’s unfitness for office. Though her mic was off, Harris effectively used versions of “what the heck is he talking about” facial expressions during Trump’s rambling responses.
And ramble Trump did. He acted how his advisors instructed him to for maybe a few minutes, before basically just delivering Fox News soundbites and MAGA rally excerpts. Trump looked angry, Harris came off like a seasoned prosecutor she is, and Harris ostensibly won.
Will it change anything? Probably not! But besides Swift, here are the winners and losers (but mostly, it’s all losers) from the first, maybe last, Harris-Trump presidential debate:
The Trump filibuster is undefeated: I’ve never moderated a presidential debate, and I imagine it’s very hard, and probably even harder when you are dealing with a candidate like Donald Trump, whose brain is sometimes a bingo spinner shooting out random phrases. ABC’s David Muir and Linsey Davis tried to redirect or cut off Trump at times, and to fact-check him when he told coherent lies, such as reminding the public that it is always illegal to murder babies, that migrants are not eating pets, and data shows that violent crime is falling.